The Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as infructuous because the underlying original suit in the District Court was disposed of via settlement in a Lok Adalath prior to the revision.
The civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. Costs are not awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1836 of 2013
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed challenging the order, dated 22.01.2013, passed in I.A. No.767 of 2012 in O.S. No.77 of 2009, by the VII Additional District & Sessions Judge, (FTC), Vijayawada, wherein, the petition filed to receive the documents on behalf of the petitioners and to permit them to adduce documentary evidence was dismissed.
As per the information received by this Court, O.S. No.77 of 2009 on the file of VII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, was disposed of on 11.04.2015 as the matter was settled before Lok Adalath, as such, the petition has become infructuous .
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous . No costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J
Date:05.07.2017 BV
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India should be allowed as the underlying suit was settled and disposed of in a Lok Adalath.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent
MSATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
