The court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the main case (M.V.O.P.No.470 of 2011) was disposed of on 22.11.2014. Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed with no order as to costs.
Motion dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SEETHARAMA MURTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1530 of 2013
ORDER:
At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the main case viz., M.V.O.P.No.470 of 2011 itself was disposed of on 22.11.2014, no cause survives for adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition.
Recording the submissions, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
___________________________________ JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI Au gu st 2 , 2 0 1 7 Lm v
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition survives for adjudication after the main case is disposed of.
Petitioner
Respondent
M. SEETHARAMA MURTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
