Smt. Pulimi Ramanamma, v. Pulimi Venkateswara Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY C.R.P.No.1088 OF 2013…
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY C.R.P.No.1088 OF 2013…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
C.R.P.No.1088 OF 2013
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive for adjudication as the suit was disposed of on 30.11.2016 by the Senior Civil Judge, Kavali and hence, the revision petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition
is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions in the petition, if any,
shall stand closed.
__________________________________
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J
22.06.2017
kvrm
Petitioner
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court