This common order dismisses the petition for condonation of delay and rejects the consequential revision petition. The court refused to condone a 278-day delay as the petitioner failed to produce medical evidence for alleged typhoid.
Condonation of delay and the revision petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CRL.R.C.M.P.No.1455 of 2017 IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.894 of 2017
COMMON ORDER :
Crl.R.C.M.P.No.1455 of 2017 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone delay of 278 days in preferring the revision.
2
Consequently, Crl.R.C.No.894 of 2017 is rejected.
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
mar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the revision petition is condonable given the alleged illness.
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
