Revision against a non-final order dismissed as not maintainable under Section 397(2) Cr.P.C.; petitioner advised to file fresh application before trial court.
Revision dismissed; petitioner advised to file fresh application before trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRI MI NAL REVI SI ON CASE No.2 0 6 9 of 2 0 1 7
JUDGMENT:
This Criminal Revision Case, under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C, is filed to direct XXV Special Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, for issuance of Doctor Order Dt.10.07.2017 in C.C.No.294 of 2015.
The Order under challenge is not a final Order and no revision is maintainable against the said Order, in view of the bar under Section 397(2) Cr.P.C. and thereby the present Criminal Revision Case is liable to be dismissed as not maintainable.
Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as not maintainable. However, it is left open to the petitioner to file appropriate application before the trial Court, if so advised.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this case, shall stand dismissed.
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Date: 02-08-2017. eha
2
HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Cr l.R.C. No.2 0 6 9 of 2 0 1 7
Dt. 02-08-2017
eha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. is maintainable against an impugned order that is not a final order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
