The acting Chief Justice allowed the appellant's submission that the Writ Appeal and Writ Petition had become infructuous due to subsequent developments and disposed of the matters accordingly.
Disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No.137 OF 2016 and WRIT PETITION No.3723 OF 2016
DATED: 01.03.2016
WRIT APPEAL No.137 OF 2016
Between: Koya Nagamani … Appellant and The State of Telangana and others … Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No.137 of 2016 and WRIT PETITION No.3723 OF 2016
PC: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr. P.Rama Sharana Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of the subsequent development, the Writ Appeal and the Writ Petition have rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
The Writ Appeal and the Writ Petition are disposed of as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
1st MARCH, 2016.
_________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J
kvni
Koya Nagamani
The State of Telangana
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
