The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the department's refusal to permit attendance in IV year I semester examinations. During hearing, the petitioner was allowed to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
WRIT PETITION No.36396 of 2015
ORDER:
1 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner's representation dated 30.10.2015 and in not permitting the petitioner to attend the IV year I
Semester Examination of B.Tech. (Mech) Engineering Course scheduled to be conducted from 09.11.2015 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents Nos.1 and 2 to permit the petitioner to attend IV year I semester examination of B.Tech(Mech) Engineering.
2 When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded.
3 In the result, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending in this Writ Petition, if any, shall stand closed.
__ ________________________ T. SUNIL CHOWDARY, J.
Date: 26.09.2016 Kvsn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition seeking direction to permit examination attendance should be allowed when the petitioner seeks to withdraw it.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondents Nos.1 and 2
T. Sunil Choudry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
