Petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 seeking mandamus against respondents for not processing D.Ed. applications. No representation was filed on the hearing date. The writ was dismissed for default and closed.
Writ petition dismissed for default; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
WRIT PETITION No.26759 of 2013
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not processing the applications of the petitioner–Institution to write 1st year D.Ed., Examinations for the academic year 2012–13 as illegal and arbitrary.
________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J September 26, 2016. YS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner-Institution
Respondents
T. Sunil Chowdary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
