The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as infructuous without assigning specific reasons or adequateness to avoid hearing costs.
Civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5518 of 2009
ORDER:
This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders dated 29.9.2009 in I.A.No.822 of 2009 in O.S.No.325 of 2009 on the file of the Court of I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad.
_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 23.9.2016. YS
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
T. SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
