Disposed

Dr. Prof. P. Padmavathi, W/o. P. Gangadhar, v. Government of Ap, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC20 Apr 2016WP/30651/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This PIL petition sought directions to appoint a Vice Chancellor for a University. The Court recorded submissions appointing the respondent to complete the appointment by June 30, 2016, and dismissed the petitions on that undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Directed the State to appoint a Vice Chancellor completing the process by June 30, 2016, following due law.

Dr. Prof. P. Padmavathi, W/o. P. Gangadhar, Vs… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE

¶2

AND

¶3

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶4

WRIT PETITION (PIL) No. 43 OF 2016; WRIT PETITION Nos. 11176 OF 2012; 29964 and 30651 OF 2013

¶5

20-04-2016

¶6

WRIT PETITION (PIL) No. 43 OF 2016

¶7

Between:

¶8

Telangana State Federation of University Teachers Association, regd. No. 871/2005, rep., by its Secretary General, Prof. B. Manohar, S/o. Sri B. Bojanna, aged 51 years, Professor in Department of Chemistry, Osmania University, Hyderabad - 500007

¶9

… Petitioner

¶10

And

¶11

State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana and others

¶12

… Respondents

¶13

HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶14

WRIT PETITION (PIL) No. 43 OF 2016; WRIT PETITION Nos. 11176 OF 2012; 29964 and 30651 OF 2013

¶15

PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

Learned Additional Advocate General, on instructions, submits that the 1^st respondent in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 43 of 2016 shall take steps to appoint Vice Chancellor of the respondent – University and shall complete the process before the end of June, 2016.

¶18

In view of the statement made by learned Additional Advocate General, learned counsel for the petitioners state that the petitions may be disposed of directing the 1^st respondent to appoint Vice Chancellor by following the due procedure and appoint a person who is competent to hold the post of Vice Chancellor.

¶19

In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice:

¶20

“Respondent No.1 shall take steps to make an appointment of Vice Chancellor of the respondent – University and complete the process of appointment on or before 30-06-2016. It is needless to mention that the 1^st respondent shall follow the due procedure contemplated by law and that they shall appoint the person who is competent to hold the post of Vice Chancellor. It is further made clear that once the process of selection and appointment of Vice Chancellor is complete and the appointment order is issued, the

¶21

In-charge Vice Chancellor shall cease to be the Vice Chancellor without further reference to the Court and shall handover the charge to the newly appointed Vice Chancellor. If that it not done, it would be open to the newly appointed Vice Chancellor to take charge unilaterally. This however shall not preclude either the In-charge Vice Chancellor or any other person to challenge the appointment of Vice Chancellor, if he/she desires or advised, before the appropriate forum, on all the grounds that may be available in law.”

¶22

With these observations, the writ petitions are disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶23

_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ

¶24

________________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J 20-04-2016 ks

Dr. Prof. P. Padmavathi, W/o. P. Gangadhar, v. Government of Ap, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Prof. P. Padmavathi, W/o. P. Gangadhar, v. Government of Ap, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of a.P., rep. by its Secretary, Vs Smt. Attanti Vijaya

M/s. Siri Wines, Vs Yadida Sri Ram Kumar

Challa Linga Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

The Indian institute of Architects (Ap Chapter) Vs Government of A.P.

S.L. Meharbaba, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Dr. Roya Rozati, Vs The Andhra Pradesh State Human Rights