The High Court disposed of Writ Appeal No. 1825 of 2005 filed by M/s. Sri Wines as infructuous through the passage of time, with miscellaneous petitions also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No. 1825 of 2005
Date: 19.04.2016
Between:
M/s. Siri Wines, rep., by its Proprietor, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
… Appellant
And
Yadida Sri Ram Kumar & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No. 1825 of 2005
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri G. Sravan Kumar, learned counsel holding for Sri O. Manohar Reddy, advocate on record for the appellant, submits that with the passage of time, writ appeal has rendered infructuous.
Writ appeal is disposed of as infructuous.
of. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________________ DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________
P.
NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 19.04.2016 ES
M/s. Siri Wines
Yadida Sri Ram Kumar
Dilip B. Bhosale
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
