The petitioners withdrew the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority for a maintenance grant. The Court directed the authority to decide within 12 weeks.
Writ petition dismissed; liberty granted to seek maintenance within 12 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 2900 OF 2001
28-01-2016
Between:
Siddiqui Aided Schools Committee, Sirivella, rep., by its Manager & Correspondent, K.J Saheb Bashasiddiqui, S/o. K.Moinuddin Siddiqui, aged 52 years, R/o. Sirivella, Kurnool District and another
… Petitioners
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 2900 OF 2001
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri K. Jaganmohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the appropriate authority seeking maintenance grant equal to the actual expenditure on the basis of the judgment of this Court in Recognised Schools Managements Assn.
V. Govt. of A.P[1] and the judgment of the Division Bench in Writ Appeal No. 526 of 1997 arising from the order of the learned Single Judge in said case.
Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed. If the petitioners make any such representation, we hope and trust that the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The petitioners are directed to place a copy of this order along with their representation before the concerned authority. It is made clear, as requested by learned Special Government Pleader, that the orders passed in the aforementioned judgments by the learned single Judge and the Division Bench would be subject to appeal, if any.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. No order as
to costs.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ S.V. BHATT, J 28-01-2016 ks
[1] 1997 (3) ALD 40
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Recognised Schools Managements Assn. V. Govt. of A.P 1997 (3) ALD 40Referred¶14
SIDDQUII AIDED SCHOOLS COMMITTEE, SIRIVELLA AND ANOTHER
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S. V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
