A writ petition regarding the petitioner's request for custody and access to his son, pending a divorce case in Family Court, was disposed of as not pressed. The court directed the petitioner to file an application before the Family Court.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed; petitioner directed to file application before Family Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.1592 of 2016
Dt:28.01.2016
Between: M.Shanmukh. … Petitioner And The State of Telangana and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.1592 of 2016
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition and submits that the petitioner shall make an application for custody and/or access to his son Master M.Mahanth before the Family Court, where divorce petition is pending and direction may be issued to the Family Court to decide his application expeditiously.
Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. It is open to the petitioner to make an application, as aforementioned, and if any such application is filed, we hope and trust that the Family Court shall decide the same expeditiously on merits in accordance with law.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J Dt:28.01.2016 kdl
M.Shanmukh
State of Telangana
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
