T.Pandari v. The a.P.State of A.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE…
CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.2165 of 1998
Dt:27.01.2016
Between: T.Pandari and others.
… Petitioners
And The State of Andhra Pradesh and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.2165 of 1998
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr.Damoder Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that with the passage of time, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________
________________________
Dt:27.01.2016 kdl
T. Pandari and others
The State of Andhra Pradesh and others
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court