Writ petition challenging university regulations and refusal of course affiliation was closed as counsellinq was concluded, with liberty to seek remedies for the next academic year.
Writ petition closed; liberty granted to approach the court again for the next academic year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS
WRIT PETITION No.25893 of 2016
Between:
PETITIONERS
And
RESPONSENTS
VRS,J & ASN,J. W.P.No.25893/2016
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS WRIT PETITION No.25893 of 2016
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)
The petitioners came up with the above writ petition challenging the regulations of the university and also challenging the action of the university in refusing to grant affiliation to certain courses.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A. Abhishek Reddy, learned counsel for the University.
At the time when the writ petition came up for orders as to admission, we heard the learned counsel on both sides and we were not inclined to pass any interim order. Now the counselling is over. Therefore, for the current academic year the grievance of the petitioners cannot be redressed. Hence the writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedies for the next academic year. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
______________ JUSTICE ANIS.
7th September, 2016 Js.
Chatla Venkatesham Memorial (CVM) Educational Society
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University
V. Ramasubramanian
Anis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
