The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous based on the statement by the petitioner's counsel. No order as to costs was made.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE ANIS
WRIT PETITION No. 7770 of 2012
ORDER: (Per VRS,J)
It is stated by Mrs. Divya Datla, learned counsel, representing Mr. Ch. Pushyam Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the said statement,
the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the
writ petition shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
____________________ ANIS, J. 6th September, 2016 cbs
VRS,J & ANIS,J WP No. 7770 of 2012
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE ANIS
Writ Petition No. 7770 of 2012
(Per VRS,J)
6th September, 2016
cbs
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
ANIS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
