Disposed

Madarsa-I-Aizza Educational Society, v. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (Jntu)

Telangana HC7 Sept 2016WP/24882/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging refusal of university affiliation for undergraduate and post-graduate courses. Court granted interim relief for B.Tech-EEE counselling but dismissed petition for MBA due to lack of eligible Doctorate degree holders, directing university to regularize B.Tech-EEE affiliation.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed. University directed to regularize B.Tech-EEE affiliation. Petitioners directed to improve deficiencies for MBA and other courses for next academic year.

Madarsa-I-Aizza Educational Society, Vs… — Education and Admissions | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.24882 of 2016

¶3

Between:

¶4

Madarsa-I-Aizza Educational Society, 16-4-1, New malakpet, Hyderabad, rep.by its Secretary Mahboob Alam Khan, and others.

¶5

PETITIONERS And

¶6

Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU), Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar, and others.

¶7

RESPONSENTS

¶8

VRS,J & ASN,J. W.P.No.24882/2016

¶9

¶10

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS WRIT PETITION No.24882 of 2016

¶11

ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)

¶12

Aggrieved by the refusal of the university to grant affiliation to some of the undergraduate and post-graduate courses, the petitioners came up with the present writ petition.

¶13

On 28.07.2016 we passed an interim order directing the university to include the petitioner-institutions for counselling for B.Tech-EEE course. Accordingly it was granted and the counselling is now over. Though there are several other courses, in respect of whose disaffiliation the petitioners are aggrieved, the petitioner focused mainly upon the disaffiliation to MBA course. Therefore, we directed Mr. A. Abhishek Reddy to get instructions.

¶14

On instructions it was pointed out by the learned counsel for the university that the persons, whom the petitioners wanted the university to consider as Doctorate degree holder for teaching MBA students, cannot be counted for various reasons. The learned counsel for the university also produced the minutes of the Selection Committee proceedings. In the light of the above we are of the considered view that for the current year, the affiliation for MBA cannot be considered.

¶15

Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the university to regularize the affiliation granted to B.Tech-EEE for the current academic year. Insofar as the other courses are concerned, it will be open to the petitioners to make good the deficiencies and

¶16

VRS,J & ASN,J. W.P.No.24882/2016

¶17

¶18

the respondents shall process the matter well in advance for the next academic year. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶19

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶20

______________________________ JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

¶21

______________ JUSTICE ANIS.

¶22

7^th September, 2016 Js.

Madarsa-I-Aizza Educational Society, v. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (Jntu)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madarsa-I-Aizza Educational Society, v. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (Jntu)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Casuarina Capital and Finance Private Limited Vs Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-Ii

The Commissioner of Customs Vs M/s. Vst Industries Ltd.

Grandhi Hanumayanuna, Vs Grandhi Lalitha

Guru Nanak Educational Society, Vs Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (Jntu)

Chatla Venkatesham Memorial (Cvm) Educational Society Vs Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad

Anwar ul Uloom Educational Association, Vs Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University