Petitioners, Ticketing Inspectors of South Central Railways, challenged a Tribunal order rejecting their representation against posting to far-off divisions pending inquiry. The Court found no merit as the directive circular was non-mandatory. Writ petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD
Writ Petition Nos.39281 and 39331 of 2016
Common Order: (per V.Ramasubramanian, J.)
The petitioners who were working as Ticketing Inspectors in the Squad, of the South Central Railways, went before the Tribunal challenging the orders by which they were posted to far-off divisions. The Tribunal dismissed the original applications forcing the petitioners to come up with the present writ petitions.
VRS, J. & GSP, J. wps_39281& 39331_2016
2
16th November, 2016. Ak
VRS, J. & GSP, J. wps_39281& 39331_2016
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD
Writ Petition Nos.39281 and 39331 of 2016 (per VRS, J.)
16th November, 2016. (Ak)
2 issues framed by the court
Challenging a judicial order that rejected a representation against posting to a far-off division pending an inquiry.
Whether a directive circular requiring accommodation in adjoining divisions is mandatory when posting a post-suspension employee pending inquiry.
Ticketing Inspectors
South Central Railways
V. Ramasubramanian
G. Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
