The writ petition calling on petitioner was dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel for the petitioner was absent on two separate dates. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.22963 of 2006
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner was absent when the matter was called on 27.10.2016. Even today also when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is absent.
Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
___ _____________________________
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO , J
28.10.2016
MVA
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
