The Court closed the Contempt Case No.1466 of 2016 alleging non-implementation of a previous order. The Court declined to adjudicate the violation due to the pendency of the main writ petition (W.P.No.19600/2013), holding that the petitioner can raise the matter during the hearing of the main petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1466 of 2016
ORDER :
This Contempt Case is filed alleging nonimplementation of the order in W.P.M.P.No.24019/2013 in W.P.No.19600/2013 dated 07.08.2015.
Though the respondents filed a copy of the proceedings dated 27.08.2016 in compliance with the said order, the same is disputed by the learned counsel for petitioner. In view of pendency of the main writ petition i.e., W.P.No.19600/2013, this Court is not inclined to adjudicate the violation and it is open to the learned counsel for petitioner to raise this point at the time of hearing the main writ petition.
Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___ _____________________________ A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO , J 28.10.2016 MVA
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
