Disposed

Smt. Alluri Lakshmi, v. The Sub-Registrar,Madhuravada

Telangana HC22 Jan 2016WP/21103/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging the notification of land was disposed of on directions. The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation to the District Collector within two weeks to comply with a prior order, considering her inability to do so due to her husband's death.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file representation to District Collector within two weeks; exercise to be completed within six weeks.

Smt. Alluri Lakshmi, Vs The… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶2

WRIT PETITION No. 21103 of 2007

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Government Pleader for Revenue.

¶5

The present writ petition came to be filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus with the following prayer:

¶6

i) declaring G.O.Ms.No.585 Revenue (Registration-I) Department, dated 04.05.2005 as illegal, arbitrary and un-constitution;

¶7

ii) to direct the respondents to receive, register and deliver any conveyance deed executed by the petitioner in favour of any third party pertaining to plot No.73 an extent of 233 square yards in L.P.No.25/91 covered by Sy.No.59 of Pothina Mallayyapalem of Visakhapatna;

¶8

iii) to direct the respondents to cause denotification of her plot No.73 in Sy.No.59 of Pothina Mallayyapalem from the notification in G.O.Ms.No.585, Revenue (Registration-I) Department dated 04.05.2005 and thereby to receive, register and deliver conveyance deed executed by her in favour of any third party pertaining to the said plot.

¶9

Though various grounds are raised in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 01.05.2009 this Court permitted the petitioner to make a representation to the District Collector within two weeks from the said date and the same was directed to be considered in the light of the report of M.R.O. Further the exercise was directed to be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the

¶10

representation.

¶11

The counsel for the petitioner further submits that since the husband of the petitioner died she could not comply with the said condition. It is stated that great prejudice would be caused if the writ petition is dismissed for non-compliance of the said order.

¶12

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to comply with the order dated 01.05.2009 by making a representation to the District Collector within a period of two weeks from today, in which event the same shall be considered in the light of the report of M.R.O. referred to in the order dated 01.05.2009. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of representation and a copy of the order passed by the Collector shall be communicated to the petitioner.

¶13

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶14

_________________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶15

22.01.2016 Note: Issue C.C. by Monday. B/o gkv

Smt. Alluri Lakshmi, v. The Sub-Registrar,Madhuravada

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Alluri Lakshmi, v. The Sub-Registrar,Madhuravada

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vasamsetti Srinivasa Rao Vs Chirla Sri Rama Chandra Redddy

M.V.S.R. Prasad S/o Madhava Rao Vs The Government of a.P., rep by Principal Secretary

D. Sammaiah, Vs The Divisional Engineer Electrical (Construction and

Prathipati Samabasiva Rao S/O subbaiah, Residing at Gani Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by The

Vaklothu Pedda Balu Naik, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sri Bachala Ramesh, Vs The Commissioner and Inspector General