The single-judge High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioners submitted that the cause of action no longer survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.2268 OF 2009
ORDER:
At the time when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
_______________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
Date:22.01.2016 INL
C. Praveen Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
