Dismissed

M.V.S.R. Prasad S/o Madhava Rao v. The Government of a.P., rep by Principal Secretary

Telangana HC21 Jan 2016WP/19946/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice C. Praveen Kumar allowed withdrawal of various writ and criminal petitions filed before this court. Permission to withdraw was accorded in some cases, while in others, liberty to seek other remedies or discharge was reserved. Associated miscellaneous petitions were dismissed or closed.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petitions allowed; pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed or closed. Liberty reserved for some petitioners.

M.V.S.R. Prasad S/o Madhava Rao Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.19946 of 2006

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.

¶5

Permission as sought for is accorded.

¶6

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending, shall also stand dismissed.

¶7

JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶8

21.01.2016. vhb

¶9

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶10

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7907 of 2013

¶11

ORDER:

¶12

After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition.

¶13

Permission as sought for is accorded.

¶14

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

¶15

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶16

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7907 of 2013

¶17

ORDER:

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition, reserving liberty to the petitioners to file an application for discharge, in case the charges have not already framed in C.C.No.

¶19

Reserving the liberty as sought for, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand dismissed.

¶20

JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶21

21^st August, 2013. Gkv

¶22

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8819 of 2013

¶24

22^nd day of August, 2013

¶25

BETWEEN :

¶26

Ravinuthala Venkata Subba Rao .. Petitioner

¶27

And

¶28

The State Inspector of Police, Korisapadu Police Station, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and another .. Respondents

¶29

This court made the following :

¶30

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶31

CRIMINAL PETITION No.8839 of 2013

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition, with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedies available under law.

¶34

Reserving the said liberty, the criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand dismissed.

¶35

_________________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶36

22^nd August, 2013. gkv

M.V.S.R. Prasad S/o Madhava Rao v. The Government of a.P., rep by Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.V.S.R. Prasad S/o Madhava Rao v. The Government of a.P., rep by Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Secunderabad Printed Cartons Pvt. Ltd., Regd.office Vs M/s.Oriental Insurance company Ltd., Rep.by its

Smt. G.Leela Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Koduru Narayana Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

D. Sammaiah, Vs The Divisional Engineer Electrical (Construction and

Vasamsetti Srinivasa Rao Vs Chirla Sri Rama Chandra Redddy

Prathipati Samabasiva Rao S/O subbaiah, Residing at Gani Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by The