In this writ petition seeking mandamus for release of increments and pay scales, the petitioner was absent. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution during a hearing adjourned before due to lack of representation.
None granted; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.13768 OF 2007
DATED:23-09-2016
Between:
SK. Azeez Pasha … Petitioner And The District Educational Officer Warangal and others … Respondents
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: None appeared
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS: G.P. for Education (TS)
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2 CVNR, J
WP 13768/2007
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the increments and Revised pay scales and other attendant benefits due to the petitioner on the untenable ground that the 4th respondent has not handed over the Service Book and Qualification Certificates of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust and violative of articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution and opposed to all canons of equity, justice and fair play and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled for releasing the increments and Revised Pay Scales and other attendant benefits.”
On 17.9.2016 the case was adjourned at the request of the learned
counsel for both parties. Today, at the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
_______________________
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
23-09-2016
bnr
S.K. Azeez Pasha
District Educational Officer Warangal
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
