The petitioner challenged the suspension of his authorization as a fair price shop dealer. The Court held the cause was infructuous and dismissed the writ petition, vacating the interim order as well.
The writ petition and the interim order stood dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRI T PETI TI ON No.5675 of 2013
17.09.2016
Between:
P.Venkatasubbaiah
..Petitioner
And
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nellore and another
..Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.V.Sudhakar Reddy
Counsel for the respondents: Government Pleader for Civil Supplies
The Court made the following:
CVNR, J W.P.No.5675 of 2013 17.09.2016
2
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare proceedings in Rc.C.550/2013, dated 19.02.2013, issued by respondent No.1, suspending the authorization of the petitioner as the permanent fair price shop dealer of shop No.56 of Nellore City, as illegal and arbitrary.
infructuous.
___________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
17th September, 2016 GHN
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable given the cause has become infructuous.
P.Venkatasubbaiah
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nellore
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
