Per the Acting Chief Justice, citing a subsequent development, the petitioner instructed counsel not to press the writ petition. The writ petition was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Writ Petition No. 13684 of 2016
Date:25.04.2016
Between: Smt. Jonnalagadda Mahalakshmamma, Epuru Mandal, Guntur District.
…..Petitioner
And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Writ Petition No.13684 of 2016
PC:(Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr. G. Jagadeeswar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the development subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, he has instructions not to press the writ petition.
The writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.
____________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J 25th April, 2016 Pnb
Smt. Jonnalagadda Mahalakshmamma
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Dilip B. Bhosale
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
