The High Court permitted the withdrawal of the pending writ petition and dismissed it accordingly, leaving no substantive legal proposition or binding precedent established.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition accorded; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.1333 of 2016
ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue any other remedies available under law.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
________________________________ JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
19.01.2016 v v
Petitioner
Respondent
R.Subhash Reddy
A.Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
