The writ petition challenging a sale notice under the Land Acquisition Act was dismissed as infructuous at the admission stage because, pursuant to the impugned notice, no auction was conducted on the scheduled date, thereby causing the cause of action to cease.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.1061 of 2016
ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented that pursuant to the impugned Sale Notice dated 05.12.2015, no auction was conducted on 12.01.2016 and hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, at the admission stage. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
________________________________ JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA 18.01.2016. Msr
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.1061 of 2016
18.01.2016 Msr
R. Subhash Reddy
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
