In a PIL regarding the 2015-16 marketing season, the Court held the petition infructuous as the season concluded before filing, dismissing it without engaging substantive issues.
The PIL and pending miscellaneous applications were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Public Interest Litigation No.366 of 2015
Date:18.3.2016
Between: Poojari Sridhar, Srinivas Colony, Gadwal Town, Mahabubnagar District.
…..Petitioner
And Union of India, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Textiles, New Delhi and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Public Interest Litigation No.366 of 2015
PC:(Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
From bare perusal of the prayer made in the petition, it is clear that the petition has rendered infructuous, since 2015-16 marketing season got over in December, 2015. This is not in dispute.
Hence, the Public Interest Litigation is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications shall also stand closed.
____________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J 28th March, 2016
Pnb
Poojari Sridhar
Union of India
Dilip B. Bhosale
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
