Disposed
Mohd Rafi, v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCPIL/257/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.257 OF 2014
DATED: 14.03.2016
Between: Mohd. Rafi and others … Petitioners and The State of Telangana and others
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.257 of 2014
PC: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioners in the instant petition seek the following
relief:
“For the reasons stated in the accompanied affidavit, it is therefore humbly prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Writs more appropriately a Writ of Mandamus declaring the resolution passed by the 2nd and 3rd respondents agenda item No.7 dated : 31.07.2014 shifting the Vegetable Market from Devarakota to Gandhi Park and giving it name as Gandhi Vegetable Market situated at Nirmal Town, Adilabad District is illegal, void and ultra virus in the interest of justice and equity or to pass such other order or orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
Learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3, on instructions, submits that respondents 2 and 3 do not propose to shift the vegetable market from Devarakota to Gandhi Park as alleged and as stated in the petition. His statement is recorded and accepted.
In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this PIL.
PIL is disposed of as not pressed.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also
stand disposed of.
________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
14th MARCH, 2016.
_________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J kvni
Mohd. Rafi and others
The State of Telangana and others
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court