Disposed
Mr. Katakam Mruthyunjayam, v. State of Telangana
Telangana HCPIL/291/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.291 OF 2015
DATED: 14.03.2016
Between: Katakam Mruthyunjayam … Petitioner and State of Telangana and others … Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.291 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned Special Government Pleader submits that the State Government has constituted Complaint Adjudicating Committee vide G.O.Ms.No.9, dated 24.02.2016 to deal with grievances/complaints by citizens/NGOs in an effective and time bound manner. He placed the G.O. on record. Having confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of PIL with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the Complaint Adjudicating Committee within a period of two weeks from today.
PIL is disposed of as not pressed. If the petitioner makes representation as afore-mentioned, the Complaint Adjudicating Committee shall deal with the same promptly in proper perspective and take it to its logical conclusion. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
14th MARCH, 2016.
kvni
P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Katakam Mruthyunjayam
State of Telangana
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court