In PIL No. 363 of 2015, filed regarding investigation delay in an FIR, the High Court disposed of the petition as not pressed since the Government had already granted sanction for prosecution under Section 197 CrPC.
Petition disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
PIL No. 363 OF 2015
11-04-2016
Between: Syed Taraq Quadri
… Petitioner
And
State of Telangana, rep., by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and others
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
PIL No. 363 OF 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
By this public interest litigation (PIL), the petitioner seeks direction to respondent Nos.1 to 6 to complete the investigation in FIR No.1 of 2013 registered at Police Station Nirmal (T), Adilabad District against respondent No.7 and file charge sheet at the earliest.
Sri Venugopal, learned Government Pleader has placed on record G.O.Rt.No.229, dated 02-04-2016, whereby the Government has accorded sanction for prosecuting respondent No.7 who is an MLA under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He has also served a copy of the Government Order on the counsel for the petitioner.
In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the writ petition.
Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________
11-04-2016 ks
Syed Taraq Quadri
State of Telangana, rep., by its Secretary, Home Department
Dilip B. Bhosale
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
