Writ appeal declared infructuous. Question of law raised kept open for appropriate proceedings. Miscellaneous petition disposed of.
Writ appeal disposed of as infructuous; question kept open; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No. 1854 of 2005
Date: 07.04.2016
Between:
Dr. A. Sridhar Reddy
… Appellant
And N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Rep., by its Registrar, Vijayawada, & another.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No. 1854 of 2005
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri P. Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that cause does not survive but the question raised in the appeal may be kept open to be raised in appropriate proceedings.
Sri Taddi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the respondents, has no objection for passing such order.
Hence, writ appeal is disposed of as infructuous. The question of law raised in the appeal is, however, kept open to be raised in appropriate proceedings.
Miscellaneous petition, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________ DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________
P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 07.04.2016 Es
Dr. A. Sridhar Reddy
N.T.R. University of Health Sciences
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
