The writ petition was not pressed by counsel who sought liberty to approach the respondent for redressal. The court disposed of the matter accordingly.
Petitioner granted liberty to approach respondent No. 1 for redressal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 26366 of 2008
Date: 11.04.2016
Between: Poludasu Vemana … Petitioner And Municipal Commissioner, Chirala Municipality, Chirala, Prakasam District & others.
… Respondents
This Court made the following:
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 26366 of 2008
PC: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri B. Thimothi, learned counsel for the petitioner, does not press this writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent No.1 for redressal of his grievance.
Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
________________________ DILIP. B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 11.04.2016 ES
Poludasu Vemana
Municipal Commissioner, Chirala Municipality
Dilip B. Bhosale
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
