This judgment is a single-line order dismissing a public interest litigation for nonprosecution as the petitioner failed to appear and showed no interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 331 of 2015
Date: 06.06.2016
Between:
M/s. Bhavani youth Association, Rep., by its FounderPresident V. Rajender, Nalgonda District.
… Petitioner
And The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary for Industries, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 331 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
None appears for the petitioner. Sri C. Kumar, learned counsel holding for Sri P. Shiv Kumar, appears for respondent No.2.
On last two occasions, time was sought on behalf of the petitioner. Today, none appears for the petitioner. It seems that petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting this petition further and hence, no body is coming forward to work it out on merits. Therefore, we are constrained to dismiss the writ petition for nonprosecution. Order accordingly.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
_______________________ DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 06.06.2016
ES
M/s. Bhavani youth Association
State of Telangana
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
