The writ appeals were dismissed as infructuous because the auction of the subject matter pursuant to a court order dated 3.2.2016 rendered further proceedings unnecessary.
The writ appeals were disposed of as rendered infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Writ Appeal Nos.932, 933, 934, 936, 941 and 942 of 2015
Date:03.06.2016
Writ Appeal No. 932 of 2015
Between: P. Markhandeshwar, Zaheerabad.
…..Appellant
And
The State of Telangana Represented by its Principal Secretary, Agricutlure and Marketing Department, Hyderabad and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Writ Appeal Nos.932, 933, 934, 936, 941 and 942 of 2015
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr. Sreenivas Reddy Balakisti, learned counsel for the appellants submits that in view of the auction conducted in pursuance of the order dated 3.2.2016, nothing further survives in the appeals.
The writ appeals are accordingly disposed of as rendered infructuous.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions shall also stand closed.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J
3rd June, 2016
Pnb
P. Markhandeshwar
The State of Telangana
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
