Disposed

M/s Pattana Nivasula Hakkula Sadhana Samithi, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC6 Jun 2016WP/18202/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the sale of lands by the Government of Andhra Pradesh. The court recorded that the respondent did not propose to auction the land, leading to the disposal of the petition without deciding merits.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is disposed of. All contentions are kept open with liberty to take appropriate remedy if circumstances so demand.

M/s Pattana Nivasula Hakkula Sadhana Samithi, Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶4

WRIT PETITION No.18202 OF 2008

¶5

DATED: 06.06.2016

¶6

Between:

¶7

M/s. Pattana Nivasula Hakkula Sadhana Samithi and another

¶8

… Petitioners

¶9

and

¶10

The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others

¶11

THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶12

WRIT PETITION No.18202 OF 2008

¶13

PC: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

The petitioners, in the present Writ Petition, seek the

¶16

following relief:

¶17

“For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, it is prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring action of the 2^nd respondent in selling/disposing the lands without making housing schemes as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, without jurisdiction ultra vires the provisions of A.P.H.B. Act 1956 and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and to consequentially set aside the notification issued for the sale of following lands i.e. Bowenpally 2.00 acres, Nizampet Road 1.20 acres, Thokatta 1200 Sq.yds, Alwal 3993 Sq.yds, Girmapur 10.90 acres, Muneerabad 7.40 acres, Marredpally 13.00 acres, Bandlaguda 13.45 acres, Bandlaguda 5.30 acres, by the 2^nd respondent pursuant its E-Auction notification posted on its website either on 25.08.2008 or any subsequent date and to pass such other order or orders or direction or directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

¶18

Mr. M. Brahma Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.2, on instructions submits that as of today, respondent No.2 do not propose to auction the land in question.

¶19

His statement is recorded and accepted.

¶20

In the circumstances, nothing further survives in the Writ Petition.

¶21

Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of. All contentions of the petitioners are kept open with liberty to take appropriate remedy, if circumstances so demand.

¶22

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶23

________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ

¶24

6^th JUNE, 2016.

¶25

_________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J

¶26

kvni

M/s Pattana Nivasula Hakkula Sadhana Samithi, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Pattana Nivasula Hakkula Sadhana Samithi, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Khajamiya, Vs The State of Telangana

P.Rajamallau, Vs The Government of A.P.

Green Mint India Agritech Private Limited, Vs M/s. Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Kamsali Brahmaiah Chary Vs The Government of a.P., Rep. by its Principal

Thripuram Narsimha Rao Vs The Forest Range Officer, Manthani of

G. Goverdhan Reddy, Vs The Government of Andhra pradesh