Dismissed
N.Tirumala Rao v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Telangana HCPIL/4/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
PIL.No.4 of 2013
And
W.P.Nos.764, 767, 771, 773, 779, 780, 783, 809, 820, 904, 952, 967, 974, 976, 977 & 979 of 2013
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
All the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Advocate General for the State of Andhra Pradesh would agree that the cause in all these cases no longer survives and that the PIL and the Writ Petitions have become infructuous.
The PIL and the Writ Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
_____________________________ (U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J)
09th September 2016 JSU
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
PIL.No.4 of 2013
And
W.P.Nos.764, 767, 771, 773, 779, 780, 783, 809, 820, 904, 952, 967, 974,
976, 977 & 979 of 2013
Date: 09.09.2016
JSU
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court