The High Court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation and Writ Petitions as infructuous since the cause in all cases no longer survives. No substantive legal proposition was decided, and no relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
PIL.No.4 of 2013
And
W.P.Nos.764, 767, 771, 773, 779, 780, 783, 809, 820, 904, 952, 967, 974, 976, 977 & 979 of 2013
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
All the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Advocate General for the State of Andhra Pradesh would agree that the cause in all these cases no longer survives and that the PIL and the Writ Petitions have become infructuous.
The PIL and the Writ Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
_____________________________ (U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J)
09th September 2016 JSU
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
PIL.No.4 of 2013
And
W.P.Nos.764, 767, 771, 773, 779, 780, 783, 809, 820, 904, 952, 967, 974,
976, 977 & 979 of 2013
Date: 09.09.2016
JSU
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGANTS
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
