Chintan Singh, D/o Vijay Singh Verma v. The Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Acting Chief Justice and Justice Naveen Rao disposed of Public Interest Litigation No. 192 of 2014 as withdrawn by the counsel on instructions.
The Acting Chief Justice and Justice Naveen Rao disposed of Public Interest Litigation No. 192 of 2014 as withdrawn by the counsel on instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 192 OF 2014
Date:12.7.2016
Between:
Chintan Singh D/o Vijay Singh Verma R/o 704 Titanium PBEL city, Near Appa junction Hyderabad
….. Petitioner(s) And
The Union of India Rep by its Secretary to the Govt of India Ministry of Road Transport & Highways New Delhi and other
…..Respondents
The Court made the following: HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 192 OF 2014
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B.Bhosale)
Sri D Neeharika Reddy, counsel, holding for Sri Karthik Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner on record submits that she has instructions to withdraw Public Interest Litigation. Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions if any pending shall stand closed. No costs.
___________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
___________________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 12.7.2016 tvk
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 192 OF 2014
Date:12.7.2016
Chintan Singh
The Union of India
Dilip B.Bhosale
P.Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court