The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fathima Bojjamma against the APSRTC for default, due to her failure to comply with process requisitions within the prescribed time.
Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
"*-"j.-
FoRrHEsra?f Srcr?u.lrr8iilX?fi Brrr,ff dll?Jr".#^?frr*A'RADE.H wED N Eff yi,I55.r^iiB11,T rH DA yNo F J uL y
a
THE HoNouRABLE sR, 5Drti,*'r.ruErHARAMA MUR,
Between:
M.A.C.M.A. NO:24 93 0F 2008
F,4ttlf?lq Bojjamma, Wo.Mabbu Subbarayudu Coolie R/o.Venkatapuram _' Viilage, Nellore District, at present R/o. Naga rku rnool pr6per, IVahabubnagar OisiliCt.
...APPELLANTS/ CLAIMANTS
AND
Tne APSRTC, rep by its Managing Director, lVusheerabad, Hyderabad. (Bus No.AP 10 Z 1 690 of Nagarkurnool Depot) (SR disd. for default vide Court Order dated 1310712016)
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Appeal under Section 173 of M.V.Act, against the order and decree made in MVOP No.380/2007 dated 1511012007 on the file of the Court of the Chairman,f\ilotor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- | Additional District Judge), at Mahaboobnagar.
This Appeal/ petition coming on for orders under Rule 64 of theAppellate side Rules of the High Court on the failure of theAppellant/ Petitioner herein:
for service of notice on01/09/2008the Respondents SR herein,in the presence of Sri.K.Venkatesh Gupta, Advocatefor the Appellant/Petitioner'
lT lS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:-
SdAK.ONESIM ASSISTANJ.R EGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// L-t$
SECTION OFFICER
Kj.
HIGH COIJRT
DATED:1 3/07/2016
ORDER
1HE Si4
o
6
o (
O ?9 Arx?.$n
t.
,ii,:,.;.-r 1 -l
MACMA.No.2493 of 2008
DISMISSING THE MACIMA FOR DEFAULT.
a-*
Fathima Bojjamma
APSRTC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
