The Court dismissed a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as infructuous since the underlying suit was settled in the Lok Adalat, rendering the impugned order without cause for adjudication.
No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending in the revision closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Civil Revision Petition No.2695 of 2011
ORDER:
This civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the plaintiffs assailing the order dated 10.06.2011 of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Adoni passed in IA.no.222 of 2010 in OS.no.7 of 2008.
By the said order, the application filed by the defendants under Order VI Rule 17 read with Order VIII Rule 9 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 requesting to permit the defendants to amend the written statement was allowed.
As per the note of the Registry, it appears that the subject matter of the suit was settled in Lok Adalat on 06.10.2012. Therefore, it is obvious that no cause survives for adjudication in this revision.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand
closed.
M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J
12.07.2016 Vjl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India应具有 jurisdiction as the suit has been settled in the Lok Adalat.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Plaintiffs
Defendants
M SEETHARAMA MURTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
