Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to challenge dismissal of application for exhibitng Photostat copy of certificate. Petitioner's suit disposed of; no cause for adjudication.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Civil Revision Petition No.2726 of 2011
ORDER:
This civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner/defendant assailing the order dated 13.06.2011 of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Nidadovole passed in IA.no.296 of 2011 in OS.no.702 of 2008 whereunder and whereby the above-said IA filed by the defendant under Section 63 and 76 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking permission to exhibit the Photostat copy of a certificate dated 02.03.2006 through DW2 was dismissed.
As per the note of the Registry, it appears that the suit itself was disposed of on 06.03.2013. Therefore, no cause survives for adjudication in this revision.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand closed.
_____________________ M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J
12.07.2016 Vjl
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner/Defendant
M. SEETHARAMA MURTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
