No. Order dismissing the appeal/petition in absence of counsel for the appellant-petitioner, though respondent counsel was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
M.A.C.M.A. No.1889 OF 2009
JUDGMENT :
When the matter was listed on 15.09.2016, there was no representation for the appellant-petitioner, though, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2-Insurance Company represented the matter. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
petitioner.
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
pending in this appeal, shall stand disposed of.
___________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J
19th September, 2016
siva
Respondent No.2-Insurance Company
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
