A writ petition challenging non-issuance of a call letter for a Junior Lineman post interview was dismissed as infructuous because the recruitment was based on a yearly contract that did not survive adjudication by the date of hearing.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.10915 of 2007
ORDER :
The instant writ petition is filed seeking Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing call letter to the petitioner to attend interview for the post of Junior Lineman along with others, as illegal and arbitrary.
__________________________________ JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
17.09.2016. Msr
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.10915 of 2007
17.09.2016 Msr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging non-issuance of call letter for Junior Lineman post interview survives adjudication given yearly contract recruitment.
Petitioner (Junior Lineman Candidate)
Respondents
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
