The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying petitions were closed by an earlier order dated 22.10.2007, rendering the cause not susceptible for adjudication. No order as to costs.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.10737 of 2007
ORDER :
Heard both sides.
infructuous. No order as to costs.
__________________________________ JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
17.09.2016. Msr
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.10737 of 2007
17.09.2016 Msr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous following the closure of the underlying cause.
Whether the pending writ petition should be dismissed.
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
