The Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition as infructuous, accepting counsel's submission that the cause in question did not survive the relevant factual developments.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THURSDAY THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND SIXTEEN
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3917 OF 2010
Between: K.J. Narayana … Petitioner Vs. Mohd. Haji Abbas Ali & Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri A. Suryanarayana Counsel for the Respondents: Sri V.Ramchander Goud
The Court made the following: [order follows]
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3917 OF 2010
O R D E R :
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
cause in this Civil Revision Petition does not survive and the
present Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the Civil Revision
Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
3. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this
Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed.
JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT.
16/06/2016 I s L
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3917 OF 2010
Date: 16/06/2016
Circulation No. Court Master: I s L
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the cause survives given the factual context.
Whether the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
K.J. Narayana
Mohd. Haji Abbas Ali & Ors.
Suresh Kumar Kait
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
