Appellant was granted permission to withdraw the appeal suit, resulting in the dismissal of the suit as withdrawn and disposal of pending miscellaneous petitions as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Permission to withdraw the appeal suit accorded; Appeal suit dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
A.S. No. 557 of 2012
DATE: 16.06.2016
Between:
Keesara Narayana Reddy .. Appellant And
The Mandal Revenue Officer and 2 others .. Respondents
JUDGMENT:-
Sri Bhojraj Muralidhar Rao, learned counsel for the appellant, has filed a letter dated 15.06.2016 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Appeal Suit. Permission is accorded.
Hence, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as having been withdrawn. No order as to costs.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the Appeal Suit, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J 16.06.2016
bcj
Keesara Narayana Reddy
The Mandal Revenue Officer and 2 others
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
