Disposed

The Toshiba Electronics Limited v. The Government of Telangana, represented by its

Telangana HC15 Jun 2016WP/21001/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging the exclusion of casual workmen from voting in Trade Union Reorganization Elections. The court directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation on this matter within four weeks, inviting objections before disposal.

What did the court decide?

Directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation on voting rights of casual workmen and dispose of it within four weeks after inviting objections.

The Toshiba Electronics Limited Vs The Government… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT WRIT PETITION No.21001 of 2015

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

Vide the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks to declare the action of respondents 2 and 3 in not considering the voting rights of the casual workmen of the petitioner Union for the elections of Trade Union Reorganization Elections under the statutory provisions of the Trade Union Registration Act, 1926, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and also Section 2(S) of other Labour Laws, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and to issue a consequential direction to respondents 2 and 3 to consider their voting rights the in Trade Union Reorganization Election.

¶4

2. Heard the President of the petitioner Union in-person, the learned Government Pleader for Labour (TS) for respondents 1 to 3 and the learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5.

¶5

3. The cause of action arises in the present writ petition due to a communication dated 23.04.2015 issued by the third respondent. Being aggrieved, the petitioner Union made a representation dated 13.05.2015 to the third respondent to consider the voting rights of all the casual and associated workmen of it in the Union Recognition Elections. However, there is no response from the third respondent.

¶6

4. Keeping in view the averments in the writ petition and submission of the President of the petitioner Union in-person, I hereby direct the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner Union dated 13.05.2015 and dispose of the same, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to state that the third respondent shall invite objections from all concerned before disposing of the representation of the petitioner.

¶7

5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶8

__________________________ SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J

¶9

Date: 15.06.2016 Note: Issue CC 18.06.2016 B/o. TJMR

The Toshiba Electronics Limited v. The Government of Telangana, represented by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Toshiba Electronics Limited v. The Government of Telangana, represented by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Krishna Reddy Vs v. Rajagopala Reddy

Modugula Eswar Kalyan Reddy Vs Tripuraneni Hemalatha

V.V. Rama Rao, Vs Smt. Janaki bai (died) as Per L.Rs.

Sri Chaitanya Enterprises, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Thalluri Vijaya Prabhudayal Vs Thalluri Vijaya Sampurna Vidyasagar

M/s. Kendriya Bhandar (a Welfare Project Vs The State of Telangana