Petitioner filed Criminal Revision Case questioning lower court judgment. Parties amicably settled matter outside court. Court dismissed revision as infructuous.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed as infructuous due to out-of-court settlement of the matter between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1043 of 2015
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. questioning the judgment dated 13.02.2014 in Crl.A.No.448 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, at L.B.Nagar, wherein the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal confirming the orders dated 11.07.2012 passed in D.V.C.No.12 of 2011 by the II Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, at L.B.Nagar.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri P.Vishnuvardhan Reddy, submitted that the parties have amicably settled the matter outside the Court and no further orders need be passed in this case.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the criminal revision case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
October 19, 2016 Rns
Petitioner
Respondent
T. Sunil Chowdary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
